National Toll Free: (877) 655-1661

State law · WA

Washington diminished value claims

Autoloss has an office in the Northwest, and you are welcome to visit if you would rather meet in person.

Washington is one of the more favorable states. Courts measure damage to a car by its before-and-after market value, and a 2022 published appellate decision allowed a claim for value lost after professional repairs. In Moeller v. Farmers (2011) the Supreme Court held that particular auto policy language covered diminished value, but results depend on each policy's wording and on proving real physical loss, not mere stigma.

Start your free claim review

Step 1 of 2

Know if an appraisal will help, first.

Do you have a copy of the repair estimate?

Have photos or documents to send? Use the full form

Reviewed by Monica Fisher, Owner, Licensed Auto Appraiser and Court Expert Witness — appraisal perspective, not legal advice

Last reviewed

Washington law

What Washington law says about diminished value

Third-party claim

Against the at-fault driver’s insurer

Allowed by case law

Washington measures damage to personal property not destroyed by the before/after market-value difference. In Grothe v. Kushnivich (2022, published), the Court of Appeals held diminished value of a professionally repaired car is recoverable, citing Moeller's Court of Appeals decision, but barred double recovery. Grothe arose under a federal carrier statute applying Washington damages law.

Authority: Grothe v. Kushnivich, No. 39010-1-III (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 6, 2022) (published); Moeller v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Washington, 173 Wn.2d 264, 267 P.3d 998 (2011)

First-party claim

Against your own insurer

Depends on your policy

Moeller held a Farmers policy promising repair or replacement with 'like kind and quality' covers diminution in value between pre-accident and post-repair condition, as the average consumer would read it. The Court distinguished covered diminished value (physical damage that cannot be fully repaired) from disfavored 'stigma' damages. In Heaphy (2003), State Farm conceded its UIM coverage included diminished value. Other policy wording may differ.

Authority: Moeller v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Washington, 173 Wn.2d 264, 267 P.3d 998 (2011); Heaphy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 117 Wn. App. 438, 72 P.3d 220 (2003), review denied, 150 Wn.2d 1037 (2004)

Case law

Key Washington court decisions

Moeller v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Washington

Washington Supreme Court · 2011

173 Wn.2d 264, 267 P.3d 998 (2011)

5-4: Farmers' policy language ('repair or replace ... with other of like kind and quality') covers diminution in value of a repaired car, and the class was properly certified.

Read the decision

Grothe v. Kushnivich

Washington Court of Appeals, Division III · 2022

No. 39010-1-III (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 6, 2022) (published)

Under Washington common law (applied through the federal Carmack Amendment), damages for property damaged but not destroyed are the before/after market-value difference; loss of use during repair and diminished value of the repaired car are recoverable, but no double recovery.

Read the decision

Heaphy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Washington Court of Appeals, Division II · 2003

117 Wn. App. 438, 72 P.3d 220 (2003), review denied, 150 Wn.2d 1037 (2004)

Because State Farm conceded its UIM property-damage coverage includes diminished value, the remaining dispute (whether and how much DV the car suffered) was a factual question for arbitration, not a class action.

Read the decision

Statutes and rules

  • RCW 4.16.080(2): Three-year limitation

    Actions for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property must be commenced within three years.

  • RCW 4.16.040(1): Six-year limitation on written contracts

    Actions on a written contract must be commenced within six years.

  • RCW 4.22.005: Effect of contributory fault

    A claimant's own fault reduces damages proportionately but does not bar recovery (pure comparative fault).

  • RCW 46.29.090(1): Requirements as to policy or bond

    Minimum limits: $25,000 per person, $50,000 per accident bodily injury, $10,000 property damage (required for driving by RCW 46.30.020).

Deadlines and minimum coverage

Time limit for a property-damage lawsuit
3 years (RCW 4.16.080(2)). Property damage (tort). Contract claims against your own insurer: six years on a written contract (RCW 4.16.040(1)), subject to any valid policy limitation clause.
Minimum liability insurance
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident bodily injury; $10,000 property damage. The at-fault driver’s property-damage limit can cap what their insurer pays.
If your claim stalls
You can file a complaint with the Washington Office of the Insurance Commissioner.
Person photographing a car with a smartphone

Autoloss in WA

Appraisals for Washington vehicles

Autoloss has an office in the Northwest, and you are welcome to visit if you would rather meet in person.

We serve Washington from your repair order, photos and records, the same way we serve every state. A typical diminished-value appraisal is $250–$350, typically 24–48 hours after all required information is received.

  1. 1

    Free claim review

    Tell us about the vehicle and the Washington claim.
  2. 2

    Send photos and repair records

    Final invoice, photos, and the insurer’s claim details.
  3. 3

    Receive your appraisal

    Reviewed by Monica Fisher, with a custom demand letter.
What the report includes

Have a Washington diminished value claim?

The claim review is free: we look at your situation and tell you whether an appraisal is likely to help. The appraisal itself is a paid report. We help from start to finish, including a custom demand letter, and our support staff is a phone call away throughout the process.